rawplus™ -  lose weight and feel great

 raw food diet :: high raw food :: raw diet :: weight loss with raw foods :: raw news :: eating raw

raw and Natural foods 
NUTRITION & health news 
fast easy weight loss 
INDEPENDENT
Reports 

RAW

FOOD

PLUS

READER FAVS - Fruit for Breakfast – A Healthy Life
 
Do you want more energy? How about more of the vitamins, minerals and enzymes that your body craves? 

3 Easy Steps to Becoming More Naturally Raw 
Three very simple changes you can make to bring yourself that much closer to great health.

               LIKE Rawplus on FACEBOOK and get all the latest updates!              

“A fruit is a vegetable with looks and money. Plus, if you let fruit rot, it turns into wine, something Brussels sprouts never do.”
P. J. O'Rourke 

Articles

ARTICLEs BY DATe
click here

raw & Natural diets
3 Easy Steps to More Naturally Raw 
5 Easy Ways to Lower Your Cholesterol 
Bananas - Good! 
Diet for Menopause  
Want To Eat Raw? 
Raw Diet Defined
Enzymes and Raw Food 
About Raw Food Diet 
Raw Food Healthy?
Raw Food Diet Help
Raw Veg Smoothie
Fanaticism in Raw 
Raw with Paul Nison 
Organic Foods
Raw Food Diet Defined

FOODS  FOR HEALING
Sweet Potato
Apple A Day

Blueberry Brain Food
Fat Burning Foods
Foods High in Vit. K
Fruits Acne T reatment
Cure Diabetes  
Skim Milk & Diets
An Anti-Cancer Diet 
Digestive Disorders
Wonder of Apricots
Bananas - Good Eats
Mushrooms As Raw
Healthiest Foods 
Energize with Raw 

recipes & tips
Bar B Q Quickies for Raw Plus Fun!
Cholesterol-Free Sweet Potato Pancakes
Raw Vegetable Smoothie
Berry Cooler
Energy Bath
 
Summer Smoothie

SUPPLIMENTALS
Vitamin B8 Benefits
Fish Oil Data
Fish Oils And Health

TOXINS & HEALTH
Amazing Discoveries About Water
Toxic Fast Foods

Aspartame Vs Stevia
Super Size Me

MISC. ARTICLES
10 Steps - Natural Diet 
Healthy Appetizers
Filling On Real Food?
The Best Food   
The Yogi Diet
Fruit for Breakfast
Eating Instinctively
10 Deadly Bacteria
Juice Sensibility
Feed Your Dog BARF
Ever Hear of This Fruit
Link - Pot and Mental Health
Plus Editor Response
No One "Perfect Diet"

HEALTH & BEAUTY
Beauty and Raw Food

General Diet Info
Is The Jenny Craig Diet any good? 
Peter Jackson Weight Loss Secret 
South Beach Diet Overview 
The Mediterranean Diet 
On-line Weight Watchers Diet Helper 
Low Carb Dieters: Want a Break from the Meat? 
Depression and The Diet Connection

Resources

Frugal Shopping 
Raw Food Research
Nightshades 
Modern Herbal 
Rx Alternatives 
Diet Journals
Gluten Information
Quit Smoking
Nutrition Value of Rib Eye Steak
Easy Lunch Ideas

 

The Hunger Site


 

 

 
The Best Food   
by Dr. Randy Wysong

Everyone eats so everyone has an opinion about food. But if health is the objective, mere opinion doesn't count nor does fad or majority rule.

Most people think the average cooked diet based upon official food pyramids is just fine. Some eat predominantly fast food. Others advocate veganism (eating only plant foods), or lacto-ova vegetarianism (plants plus milk and eggs). There are also proponents of special foods such as fresh juices, soybean products and macrobiotic cooked grains and rice.

Everyone can make arguments on behalf of their beliefs. They can cite examples of people who have escaped disease and lived long. Some argue morality and ethics, such as those who say sentient animal life should not be sacrificed for food. Others set their eating practices by the standards of holy writ that eschew certain forms of foods and sanctify others. Others just eat what tastes good and that's logic enough for them.

Eating beliefs seem to take on an almost religious character. People feel guarded and pretty zealous about food and don't like others meddling. But since health is intimately linked to what we take into our mouths, thinking, honest reflection and willingness to change are in order.

It is easy to be deceived because wrong food choices may not manifest their full impact until late in life. Nutrition can even pass through genetically to affect later generations. In this regard, food ideas are also like religion in that hundreds of different sects can each claim to have the truth. But none of them needs to fear disproof since adjudication will not occur until everyone is dead and gone to the afterlife.

The body is extremely adaptable and will attempt to survive on whatever it is given. If the food is incorrect there is usually no immediate harm. But the body will eventually be stressed beyond its ability to adapt, resulting in disease, degeneration and loss of vitality. Unfortunately, such consequences are so far removed in time from the eating regimen that caused them that few understand the relationship.

So be careful before subscribing to bold claims about what is or is not good to eat. The true test of any health idea lies too far out into the future. Our best hope then is to be well grounded philosophically before we slide our legs under the dinner table.

How do we develop a healthy eating philosophy and sort through all of the competing eating ideas? I am going to explain here a very simple principle that is so reasonable you need not even look for proofs. Follow along with me and see if you don't agree.

Consider the following three premises:
1. Just like a tree is genetically adapted to absorb certain nutrients from soil, and a lion is genetically adapted to thrive on prey, and a deer is genetically adapted to browse on vegetation, so too, are humans genetically adapted to certain kinds of food.
2. The majority of foods we are presently exposed to are a product of the Agricultural/Industrial Revolution and occupy a small part of the genetic history of humans. (Refer back to the 276-mile time-line in which only a few inches represent industrial-type eating practices.)
3. The natural, genetically adapted to food for humans must predate them. In other words, how could humans exist before the food they needed to survive existed? We were completely developed biologically prior to agriculture and any method of food processing. That means whatever diet archetypal humans ate was the perfect diet because that was the diet responsible for the existence and development of the incredibly complex human organism. That diet was the milieu, the environmental nutritional womb, if you will, from which we sprung.

If you consider these three premises, the logical conclusion derived from them is that the best food for humans is that food which they would be able to eat as is, as it is found in nature.

Our tissues were designed to be bathed in food nutrients derived from natural living foods, not with dyes, preservatives, synthetics, nutritiously barren starches and refined sugars and oils. Make no mistake; if we are not eating according to this principle, our bodies are in constant deficiency, imbalance and toxin exposure. The result of generations ignoring this principle is an epidemic of obesity, chronic degenerative diseases and the exhaustion of our digestive processes.

A feature of all natural food is that it is raw - alive if you will. This is consistent with the Law of Biogenesis that says life can only come from preexisting life. Life begets life. In spite of scientists' dreams to the contrary, we have never observed life springing from non-life, nor have we ever even been able to create life from non-life in a laboratory. If we eat living foods, we enhance our own life. If we eat dead, devitalized foods we become devitalized and dead. Granted, this will not happen all at once, but as the adaptive reserves are exhausted we become just like the dead food we eat.

So a fundamental feature of our natural diet was that it was raw. Yes, even the meats, organs, eggs and insects - raw. Remember, we're far back in time, even before the use of fire (much less the microwave, stove, oven, grill, deep fryer or extruder). Studies of the diets of past cultures and today's still-primitive societies reveals that they ate exactly as their genes and the environment dictated.

We were not suddenly dropped from outer space onto Earth with fry pans, matches and rotisseries. We began on the forest floor, not in a line to a fast food counter. We had only our natural bodies in a natural world, exactly like every other creature. Every other organism on Earth eats raw foods exactly like they are found in nature. Do you think nature doesn't notice our decision to change all that?

Would tofu qualify? No, because tofu is found nowhere in nature. Would oatmeal porridge qualify? No, because oatmeal porridge is found nowhere in nature. Would hamburgers, French fries, pop, breakfast cereals, granola, canned foods, candy, sports drinks, muscle building powders, vitamins and minerals, mashed potatoes, carrot cake, croissants, bagels, Jolly Ranchers, Ding Dongs, Cocoa Krispies, Good 'n Plentys or Fig Newtons qualify? No. None of these are found as such in nature.

For those of you who are by now panicking (if not gagging) at the thought of eating raw foods, yes, there is danger of food-borne pathogens. But if you are careful and clean, the danger is far less than the danger of a lifetime eating devitalized processed foods. Raw natural foods must be safe or our ancestors would have not survived and we would not exist!

It is a choice. When faced with a choice, why not opt for the wisdom of nature? Is it not strange we are the only creatures on the planet to cook our foods? Is it a wonder, given this, that we succumb with every imaginable chronic degenerative disease virtually unknown in creatures eating the raw natural diet?

Simply think of yourself placed in nature in the total absence of modern technology. Ask yourself the question, what would I eat... and what could I eat? You could eat and digest fruits, nuts, insects, a few plants, honey, worms, grubs, eggs, milk and animal flesh. These are about the only food substances in nature humans are capable of digesting without technological (including fire) intervention. These are, in fact, the very foods that are the mainstay of nomadic primitive societies. Only when these foods become scarce do unpalatable, inedible foods such as most grains and vegetables become cooked and processed to change their palatability, neutralize toxins and increase digestibility.

So that is where we have been. But does this have anything to do with us here today in the 21st century microwave age? It has everything to do with us because it is this expansive historical context that served as the womb that shaped and defined us. It is this natural wild setting that occupies the vast majority of our history and predominates our genetics. It is the incubator within which life on planet Earth has developed.

What would have been the predominant food in the wild? Likely prey. Envision yourself placed back in time in that setting with a family to feed. You would be looking for the most calorie- and nutrient-dense foods you could find. That would not be a few wheat seeds, some grass or a root. You would let the herbivores do all the grazing and digestion with their specialized stomachs that are capable of converting essentially any plant material into edible protein and fat. Then you would eat them. I don't like that either, but that is the way it is.

Pretty simple isn't it? We should eat what nature provides that we can digest. Yet this is not explained in nutrition textbooks, and PhD nutritionists graduate without even grasping it. It cuts through all the theory, belief, and guesswork. It matches our natural bodies with our natural food.

Our immersion in modern cookery and food processing has misled us. Foods such as granola, tofu, cauliflower and lettuce, which are marketed as the ultimate health foods, are in fact not natural human foods at all. These products either do not exist in nature, are so scarce as to never possibly be a sustaining food, or in their raw precooked form are unpalatable and even toxic.

For example, raw soybeans contain a variety of chemicals that can stunt growth and interfere with the body's digestive enzymes. Eat enough of them and you'll die. Modern grain products are a result of agriculture and in their raw form are unpalatable, indigestible and also toxic. In nature one would never find enough kernels of rice, wheat or barley to even make up a meal, even if they were edible in their raw form. (Sprouted seeds and grains are an exception to this since they are digestible, raw and nutritious.)

Who, if they were really, really hungry - and options were available - would eat raw broccoli, cauliflower or lettuce? These foods are only now made palatable by cooking or doctoring with manufactured dressings.

Now this creates somewhat of a dilemma. Knowing what our natural diet is and consuming it are two different things. We are so acclimated to the modern diet that the notion of eating raw meat, for example, is nauseating to most. Nevertheless, as evidenced by primitive (but nutritionally advanced) peoples, raw meat and organs can be eaten with great nutritional benefit to humans, and they are totally digestible and nontoxic. Some cultures even bury raw meats and let them rot (ferment) and then consume them with gusto. These societies are robustly healthy until modern foods encroach. Then, like a dirty bathtub ring, modern degenerative diseases decimate those people at the periphery in contact with modern foods.

It would be very difficult today to achieve the ideal raw, natural diet. But if the basic principle is kept in mind it helps remind us of our origins and points us to the appropriate, genetically adapted-to foods.

This does not mean no processed or cooked foods should be eaten. It simply means that consistently doing so will stress the body's genetic capabilities and will ultimately result in less than optimal health.

Look around the grocery store (usually the outside aisles) and consider what it is that could be eaten in its natural state. Increase the proportion of those foods. Processed foods should be chosen that compromise natural principles the least and are as close to nature as possible. They should be whole foods, packaged carefully to protect nutrient value and be free of synthetics, refined oils and sugars.

For example, whole milk yogurt that has not been homogenized or pasteurized is ideal. The same thing pasteurized would be next best. The same thing pasteurized and homogenized next. Worst would be non-fat, pasteurized, homogenized, artificially flavored and sugared yogurt (which is, of course, what the majority eat because it tastes most like what they are used to - candy).

Eat the best foods you can find in variety and moderation and you will be doing the best that can be done.

There, you have in a nutshell what has taken me decades of research, study and thinking to discover. It is simple and obvious, but that is the way of all great truths.

About the Author

Dr. Wysong: A former veterinary clinician and surgeon, college instructor, inventor, research director for the company by his name and founder of the philanthropic Wysong Institute. http://www.wysong.net. Also check out http://www.cerealwysong.com

 

Raw Lifestyle Essentials

   
Nesco FD-1018 Gardenmaster Food Dehydrator w/8 Trays

 
Champion Juicer
One of the Finest

 
L'equip 509 Juicer

 

 

 

The Hunger Site
click today and help feed the world

"Life expectancy would grow by leaps and bounds if green vegetables smelled as good as bacon."
Doug Larson

Amazing Discoveries About Water

About Bananas 
Choosing the Healthiest Fruit



__________________

Books
Reading In The Raw

_______
"It's bizarre that the produce manager is more important to my children's health than the pediatrician."  
Meryl Streep

Raw Lifestyle
Essentials

Food Dehydrator
Champion Juicer


Organic Goji Berries Raw Crunch Bars
      

foodcom.jpg (103329 bytes)
Food Combining
For Health


NOTE - The text and articles presented on this website are in no way intended as medical advice or as a substitute for medical counseling. The information should be used in conjunction with common sense and the guidance and care of your physician. The articles presented on this website are not to be taken as medical advice. 

All rights reserved. Copyright 2003 - 2014     PRIVACY POLICY
Raw Plus adheres to the Fair Use laws in regard to articles for information purposes only.